The Sudduth Internet Post Archive I

September 2001-April 2002

 

 

The God of Anselm’s Argumentation and the God of the Bible

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rtdisc/message/30496 (10/19/01)

Answering the charge that Anselm’s Ontological argument proves little about the Biblical God

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rtdisc/message/30523 (10/20/01)

             Bearing of “sense and reference” on referring to the Biblical God

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rtdisc/message/30541 (10/21/01)

            Further point concerning sense and reference

           

A Response to Gordon Stein’s Critique of the Design Argument

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rtdisc/message/34389 (2/21/02)

            A critical analysis of atheist Gordon Stein’s critique of the design argument

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rtdisc/message/34448 (2/22/02)

            Presuppositional anxieties over classical apologetics

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rtdisc/message/34512 (2/25/02)

Answering a variety of spin-off objections to theistic arguments, especially objections to inductive or probabilistic theistic arguments (from a Van Tilian).

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rtdisc/message/34546 (2/26/02)

            Discussion on the transcendental argument for God’s existence

 

Divine and Human Knowledge

(Intuitive vs. Propositional Accounts; analogy, univocity)

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rtdisc/message/35166 (3/12/02)

            A non-propositional account of divine knowledge, first approach

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rtdisc/message/35177 (3/13/02)

            Relation between divine and human knowledge

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rtdisc/message/35242 (3/14/02)

            God’s knowledge the same as human knowledge?

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rtdisc/message/35347 (315/02)

            A non-propositional account of divine knowledge, second approach

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rtdisc/message/35481 (3/20/02)

            Further examination of divine knowledge construed as intuitive

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rtdisc/message/35712 (3/26/02)

            More on the relation between divine and human knowledge

 

Demythologizing Aquinas

(On Protestant Misrepresentations of Aquinas)

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rtdisc/message/38098 (4/21/02)

            Protestant errors concerning Aquinas on faith and reason

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rtdisc/message/38068 (420/02)

            Aquinas’ use of Aristotle and philosophy

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rtdisc/message/37945 (4/18/02)

            Recommended readings in and on Aquinas

 

Questions on Reformed Epistemology

(Clarifying the Claims of Reformed Epistemology)

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/reformed-epistemology/message/1872 (2/14/02)

            Addressing a variety of misconceptions about Reformed epistemology

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/reformed-epistemology/message/1874 (2/15/02)

            Further clarifications of the claims of Reformed epistemology

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/reformed-epistemology/message/1911 (3/24/02)

            Is Reformed epistemology foundationalist?

 

Does Reformed Epistemology Evade the Question, How Do We Know?

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/reformed-epistemology/message/1801 (12/13/01)

A response to another one of John Robbins’ criticisms against Reformed epistemology

 

Christian Apologetics (A Response to a Van Tilian)

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Theology_list/message/22237 (9/13/01)

Philosophical mistakes made by some Van Tilians in their critique of classical apologetics

 

Responding to Skepticism

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/reformed-epistemology/message/1715 (9/20/01)

            Thoughts on a particular argument against “Brain in the Vat” skeptical arguments